Doctrine · Lesson 3

The canon: which books are Scripture

The canon is the list of books the church receives as God's word and as the measure of its faith. The church recognised the Old Testament that Jesus received and the writings of the apostles through long use and discernment; Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant Christians share the same twenty-seven New Testament books but differ over some Old Testament books.

A measuring rod

The last lesson called Scripture the word of God. But which books does that mean? Open a Bible and one of the first pages lists them: in a Protestant Bible, sixty-six books, from Genesis to Revelation. Who drew up that list, and why these books and not others?

The list is called the canon, from the Greek , a straight rod for measuring, and so a rule or standard. Paul uses the word in that sense when he blesses "all who walk by this rule" (Galatians 6:16). In the second century Irenaeus called the summary of faith the church had received from the apostles the ‘rule of truth’, and by the fourth century the word had come to mean the list of books the church received as Scripture. The canon is the measuring rod by which the church tests its faith.

The Scriptures of Jesus and the apostles

Jesus already had a Bible. After his resurrection he spoke of everything "written about Me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms" (Luke 24:44). Many take these as the three parts of the Hebrew Scriptures, the Law, the Prophets and the Writings, with the Psalms standing for the third.

Jesus also spoke of the righteous blood shed "from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar" (Matthew 23:35). Abel's death is told in Genesis. The stoning of Zechariah son of Jehoiada in the temple courtyard is told in Chronicles (2 Chronicles 24:20-21), which in later Jewish order usually comes last. So many interpreters hear in Jesus' words the martyrs of the whole Bible, from its first book to its last. Who this Zechariah was has been discussed since ancient times, as Jerome's comments show Jerome, and how settled the order of the books was in Jesus' day is uncertain, so the point is a suggestion rather than a proof.

Paul counted it Israel's great privilege that "they have been entrusted with the very words of God" (Romans 3:2). Soon the apostles' own writings were standing beside those words.

For the Scripture says, "Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain," and, "The worker is worthy of his wages."

1 Timothy 5:18

The first saying is Deuteronomy 25:4. The second matches, almost word for word, a saying of Jesus in Luke 10:7. Many interpreters conclude that a word of the Lord is being quoted here as Scripture beside the law of Moses. Second Peter goes further and sets Paul's letters beside the rest of the Scriptures.

Our beloved brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom God gave him. He writes this way in all his letters, speaking in them about such matters. Some parts of his letters are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.

2 Peter 3:15-16

Matthew Henry draws the lesson that the twisting of some readers "is no reason why St. Paul's epistles, or any other part of the Scriptures, should be laid aside" Matthew Henry.

How the church recognised the New Testament

No council sat down one day and chose the New Testament. The churches read the apostles' letters in worship and passed them on to one another (Colossians 4:16), and over several generations they discerned which writings carried the apostles' witness. Three questions mattered most.

TestThe question asked
Apostolic originDoes it come from an apostle, or from someone close to the apostles?
CatholicityHave churches in many places, not just one, received it and read it?
OrthodoxyDoes it agree with the rule of faith the church received from the beginning?

Traces of this process survive. The Muratorian Fragment, an early list usually dated to the late second century (some date it to the fourth), allows that the Shepherd of Hermas may be read, but not publicly in church, because it was written after the apostles' time The Muratorian Fragment. Around 325 Eusebius sorted the books into those accepted everywhere and those disputed, placing James, Jude, 2 Peter and 2 and 3 John among the disputed books, though known to most Eusebius, Church History 3.25. The Easter letter Athanasius of Alexandria wrote in 367 is the earliest surviving list to name exactly the twenty-seven books we have; he called them "fountains of salvation" Athanasius, Festal Letter 39. The Council of Carthage in 397 confirmed the same New Testament for the African churches Council of Carthage.

Different Old Testaments, one New Testament

On the Old Testament the churches still differ. The books in question are Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, 1 and 2 Maccabees, and the additions to Esther and Daniel.

The Catholic Church and the Orthodox churches receive these books as Scripture. They point out that the books belonged to the Greek Old Testament, the Septuagint, widely used in the early church; that many Fathers quoted them as Scripture; and that ancient lists such as Carthage's include them. Catholics call them deuterocanonical, and the Council of Trent defined them as canonical in 1546 Council of Trent, Decree on the Canonical Scriptures. The Orthodox, following the Septuagint, receive a few more, and Orthodox writers describe the standing of these books in somewhat different ways.

Protestant churches hold that the Old Testament Jesus and the apostles received was the Hebrew Bible entrusted to Israel. They count it as thirty-nine books and call the others the Apocrypha, though they differ in how they use them. The Church of England's Thirty-Nine Articles, citing Jerome, say of them that "the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine" Thirty-Nine Articles, Art. 6. Luther's German Bible printed them in a section of their own between the Testaments, as books not equal to Scripture yet good to read Luther, Preface to the Apocrypha. The Westminster Confession is stricter and treats them as no more than other human writings Westminster Confession, ch. 1.

The traditions also describe the church's part differently. Protestants usually say that the church recognised a canon God had given: Scripture's authority rests on God, its author, not on the church's testimony, and some liken the church to sheep who know their shepherd's voice (John 10:27). Catholics and the Orthodox agree that the church did not invent the canon, but teach that the church, guided by the Spirit, also received authority to discern and define it, because Scripture and the church that handed it on belong together.

For all these differences, Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant Christians receive the same twenty-seven books of the New Testament. Our Bible is a gift, read, copied and guarded by generations of believers, and the point of learning its history is to receive these books as the word of God. For more on how the Bible came together, see How did we get the Bible?, and on the writings left out, What about the 'other gospels'?.

Practice

  1. Practice 1 of 8

    What did the Greek word kanōn, from which ‘canon’ comes, first mean?

  2. Practice 2 of 8

    In Luke 24:44, what three parts of Scripture does Jesus say were written about him?

  3. Practice 3 of 8

    Which two sayings does 1 Timothy 5:18 quote together as Scripture?

  4. Practice 4 of 8

    Which of these was not a test the early church used in recognising New Testament books?

  5. Practice 5 of 8

    What is the earliest surviving list that names exactly our twenty-seven New Testament books?

  6. Practice 6 of 8

    Which churches receive books such as Tobit, Wisdom, Sirach and Maccabees as Old Testament Scripture?

  7. Practice 7 of 8

    What does Article 6 of the Thirty-Nine Articles say about the Apocrypha?

  8. Practice 8 of 8

    Which pairing is accurate: the tradition that usually says the church recognised a canon God gave, and the tradition that teaches the church also received authority to define it?

Source

  1. The early church, The Muratorian Fragment — An early list of New Testament books, usually dated to the late second century (some date it to the fourth).
  2. Eusebius, Church History 3.25 — c. 325. Sorts the New Testament books into those accepted everywhere and those disputed.
  3. Athanasius, Festal Letter 39 367 — The earliest list naming exactly the 27 books of today's New Testament.
  4. Council of Carthage, Canon of Scripture 397 — Listed the books of Scripture for the African churches (including the deuterocanonical books).
  5. Council of Trent, Decree on the Canonical Scriptures 1546 — Fixed for the Catholic Church the list of Old and New Testament books, including the deuterocanonical books.
  6. Church of England, The Thirty-Nine Articles 1571 — The Anglican articles: the Church of England's teaching on God and Scripture, salvation, the church and the sacraments, in 39 articles.
  7. Martin Luther, Preface to the Apocrypha 1534 — In his German Bible, set the Apocrypha apart between the Testaments as books 'not held equal to Holy Scripture, and yet profitable and good to read'.
  8. Westminster Assembly, Westminster Confession of Faith 1646 — The Presbyterian confession: Scripture, God and his decree, the covenants, salvation, the church and sacraments, and the last things, in 33 chapters. Read

Lessons from the Bible, the church's creeds, the Fathers and classic commentary. The ecumenical creeds (the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds, the Definition of Chalcedon) are the standard; where Christians disagree, the main views are presented. Scripture quotations: BSB.